About this site

I was a Governing Board Member of the San Carlos School District, elected November 2007 and again in November 2011. This site was originally used for the purpose of communicating with school district constituents, however now it is used for surfacing ideas and expressing opinions on various subjects in education, politics, business, or otherwise.

Please note that any opinion express here is purely personal and does not necessarily reflect the position or opinion of anyone else or any organization with which I am, or have been, associated.

I will not accept anonymous comments, and all persons who post comments must have a valid e-mail address. Note that I reserve the right to edit, reject, or delete posts based on spelling, grammar, readability, or my judgment of what is appropriate discourse.


September 2015
« Aug   Nov »

The New Acronym on the Block

This week California released the 2015 CAASPP results — CAASPP is the newest acronym in CA public education. It stands for California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress, and is based on the results of the new, computer-based, Smarter Balanced Assessments (SBAC) that accompanied the recently implemented Common Core Standards. Our students first took the SBAC assessments in Spring of 2014, but that was considered a “practice year” for the test, and the assessments given in Spring of 2015 were the first ones where the scores were reported. Although the CAASPP should be a bit more useful than the old API scores as it has a better statistical methodology, doesn’t focus on a single metric, and is based on the deeper, more-relevant, Common Core Standards, focusing on standardized test scores is still fraught with issues so we must look at these scores as just one tool in our toolbox to understand how our schools and students are performing. The other big caveat here is that CAASPP only covers Math and English Language Arts — obviously we care about a lot more than that, and judging any school district (or any student) in just these two areas would be wholly incomplete. That’s why one of the District’s key goals this year is to build the framework for a larger “dashboard” of multiple measures of the health and performance of the school district. (The district has already begun collecting much more data — see an overview of the status from a recent board meeting.) In any case, this year’s CAASPP results will be a good baseline by which the district can focus efforts and measure progress in the future. Also, the CAASPP data can be broken down into different “claims” — sub-areas within Math and English Language Arts where one can see how students performed.

The CAASPP results are reported based on the percentage of students who “met the standard” in either Math or English Language Arts for that particular grade. A student is categorized as “standard not met,” “standard nearly met,” “standard met,” or “standard exceeded.” Generally districts will focus on the total percentage of students in those last two categories. The results for San Carlos were not terribly surprising and in line with what the district administration expected. Similar to the earlier STAR results, SCSD performed quite a bit better than the average of either San Mateo County or the State of California. However, SCSD lagged a bit behind the Basic Aid districts (all of which have significantly more funding than SCSD) that feed into the Sequoia Union High School District, but performed better than the other Revenue Limit / LCFF districts.

Perhaps most interesting are the results for 8th grade (as of course this is when we “hand off” the students to high school). Although Portola Valley is the clear (positive) outlier with more than double our per-student funding, SCSD performed fairly close to the other Basic Aid districts that feed into the Sequoia Union High School District and performed better than the other Revenue Limit / LCFF feeder districts as well as most other districts in the County.


Again, all of this data comes with a note of caution — it is very tricky (and to some degree, unfair) to compare our district against others, because as we know so many other factors are different — funding levels, demographics, etc. But perhaps where CAASPP will be useful is over time; 2015 becomes a baseline so that we can compare ourselves to ourselves and understand how are we making progress. Naturally, we’ll want to reduce the approximately 1/4 of students who are not meeting the standards while at the same time fulfilling the promise in our Strategic Plan of focusing on the Whole Child and creating personalized learning paths for all students to reach their potential and become problem solvers, critical thinkers, risk-takers, designers, collaborators, innovators, and contributing, empathic citizens and leaders. The District will have lots of data to help drive instruction, and CAASP results will only be one small part of the mix.

Over the next two weeks the District will be doing a deeper dive into the data and coming out with a summary analysis. Also by the end of next week, all parents should be sent an individual report as to how their student performed on the test. Lastly, the District will be holding at least one event at each school site to review what the CAASPP results mean (and what they don’t) as well as how the district will leverage them. Although I caution not to read too much into the results, if anyone has any concerns or sees trends in the information that they would like to learn more about, please attend one of these sessions or contact the principal at your school.

Comments are closed.